Picking
peaches and the Narnian chronicles
Every year I am in a race to ‘whiff’ the peachy aroma that allows
me to recognize the moment the peaches are ready to harvest. Not just because I
love peaches so much, but to pick them before we are visited by our resident
black bear. He loves peaches and tasty miracles, too. I’m not sure if in the Island
Black Bear great annals of history there are references to peaches, but if
there were not, there are now, as our black bear is a meditative, reticent
soul, who loves his food, appreciates nature, and in all likelihood is a poet
and vegetarian. He has been known to rest in my neighbor’s plum tree, after a
good long snack, and have a quiet snooze while my neighbor’s steers rest below him
and chew their cud with contentment. It is not inconceivable that he holds
small audiences of recitations of his newest work, which I’m sure comes after only
the finest of forages.
As I type this, the peaches that are still waiting to be
preserved into the gold-tinged, shining nectar-treat unstunningly known as ‘canned
peaches’ are in two buckets on the counter, giving off that peach perfume that
truly is a signature scent of summer. I almost feel sorry for our bear. But
seeing how in one night he nearly picked clean the Damson plum tree this year,
I remain hard-hearted.
Peaches, to me, are one of those deep childhood connections
to summer. Another closely aligned summer ritual is the reading of the Narnian chronicles. For years, I reread C.S. Lewis’s stories every summer, lying on a blanket under the nut trees, or sitting in a deck chair under the apple trees, or lying on the grass and clover carpet of our horse field beside my grazing ponies. When the rainy days came, and they often did on Canada’s Pacific coast, there was more time to read and many places in our sprawling farmhouse to get lost in another world between pages. I read the stories of Narnia in chronological rather than publication order. The origin of Narnia, those shining green and yellow rings worn by Digory and Polly, the quiet pools in the woods between the worlds, dull red sun of Charn, that was how I began my Narnian journey every summer. And every summer I dreaded the Last Battle when Narnia flamed out of existence; but in a bracing, clear, vision that was panoramic in scope, I saw how time was a small reflection of the True Eternal that flowed, unquenchable, constant, Real. That Love and Truth were much more than ideas and aspirations, and that we what we see now is not much more than we can by peeking through a keyhole on a dark night.The sentiment doesn’t last long, though, because they also
begin to squabble with each other. But, misery loves company and while they are
nursing their own bumps and bruises, they say, “Well, at any rate there’s no
Humbug here. We haven’t let anyone take us in. The Dwarfs are for the Dwarfs.”
After trying numerous ways to wake them to the realization that they are free
and safe and in Aslan’s country, they remain unable to see or feel the
sunlight, meadow, picnic-banquet of food and wine, warm and clean clothes that
are given to them. Aslan’s response is a sorrowful, “They will not let us help
them. They have chosen cunning instead of belief. Their prison is only in their
own minds, yet they are in that prison; and so afraid of being taken in that
they cannot be taken out.”
I cannot help but see an echo in various groups of salt-of-the-earth
good people who have become cynical and are entangled and mired in one
conspiracy theory after another. Facebook memes, Twitter retweets, Youtube
video shares have become modern assault weapons battering at common sense and
straightforward simplicity. The casualties are not the right or left, conservative
or liberal, rather they are our careful processes of learning, such as
scientific method, unbiased ethics committees, and peer review. These ‘humbug’ bombs
are aimed at our own hard work to enlarge our thinking to hear others and
recognize where are structures have minimized the voices of others. They batter
our actions and stymie our work to tear down and rebuild systems that have
doors recognizable as open to everyone. They distort measures of considerate
care of neighbor and cast doubt on earnest attempts to promote health and
wellbeing. They have normal, hard-working and loving people questioning if
their leaders are poisoning children with vaccines, or if a virus was
constructed with alien DNA to ‘take out’ a segment of the population. Or that a
bit of cotton in front of our noses and mouths causes hypoxia.
Conspiracy theories are so damaging to our thinking that
even contradictory beliefs do not trigger normal curiosity and rigorous
thought. For example, in ‘Plandemic,’ there are two origins of the current
Covid virus: that it was recently created in Wuhan, and also that it is from
previous vaccines, so we all have it already and that ‘mask wearing’ activates
it. Both cannot be true: vaccines were saving lives from polio and small pox
long before Wuhan had a lab. Following the random spiraling of conspiracy theory
is a deeply distracting and crazy-making. The only rational end to conspiracy
thinking is that no one is trustworthy. Better you than me type thinking; “the
Dwarfs are for the Dwarfs.”
These conspiracy assault weapons do not discriminate; their
casualties are collectively all of us. Distrust and suspicion always hurt
everyone. We are meant to stand together and figure things out side by side,
voice by voice, thought by thought, vigorously and whole-mindedly. Sharing passionately
in conferences, papers, and in discussions with leaders who have earned their
stripes with unabashed openness and through making mistakes and publishing
studies that contradict their own earlier studies. That is the way learning
happens. That is the way mature leadership develops. As Maya Angelou said, “I
did then what I knew how to do. Now that I know better, I do better.” That’s
science. We do better with the humility that comes with knowing your own study
will likely, at some point, give way to a better study down the road. That the
road to knowing is honest toil and unhesitating transparency in peer review
under the watchful eye of stringent ethics boards. That better studies are
designed from the vantage point of previous studies.
How about you? Are you with me, Narnians?
No comments:
Post a Comment